Comparison
πππ ππ’π π π¨π‘ππ§π¬ vs πΊπππππ πππ π πππ πππππΉ
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels β audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
πππ ππ’π π π¨π‘ππ§π¬@big_community45πΊπππππ πππ π
πππ πππππΉ@fifakingfreetips
| Metric | @big_community45 | @fifakingfreetips |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 11,040 | 23,503 |
| Avg views | 1,327 | 2,927 |
| Engagement rate | 12.0% | 12.5% |
| 30-day growth | β | β |
| Language | বাΰ¦ΰ¦²ΰ¦Ύ | বাΰ¦ΰ¦²ΰ¦Ύ |
| Category | β | β |
| Channel age | 247 days | 694 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics β we have no admin access to Telegramβs native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@big_community45
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@fifakingfreetips
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict β see the methodology.