Comparison
Blum: All Crypto – One App vs memeficlub
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @blumcrypto | @memeficlub |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 16.9M | 1,124 |
| Avg views | 1.4M | 968,731 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 86186.0% |
| 30-day growth | -15.4% | +0.0% |
| Language | English | 中文 |
| Category | crypto | gaming |
| Channel age | 904 days | 118 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@blumcrypto
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@memeficlub
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.