Comparison
شریف | Sharif vs لینکدونی گروهکده تهران گپ چت دونی🔥
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @ecoshariff | @linkdonifz |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.5M | 1.6M |
| Avg views | 199,980 | 127,720 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| 30-day growth | +148.2% | +58.8% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2387 days | 2552 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@ecoshariff
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@linkdonifz
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.