Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @mawtincrypto_vip | @shervin_trading |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 5.9M | 3M |
| Avg views | 13,292 | 48,038 |
| Engagement rate | 0.2% | 1.6% |
| 30-day growth | +110.0% | +224.3% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | 3655 days | 3424 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@mawtincrypto_vip
Mixed signals
@shervin_trading
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.