Comparison
TrendWatching vs پیشگوی وحشی 𝗩𝗮𝗵𝘀𝗵𝗶
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @trendwatching24 | @whsii |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.4M | 1.7M |
| Avg views | 85,268 | 129,908 |
| Engagement rate | 6.0% | 7.6% |
| 30-day growth | +33.1% | +42.8% |
| Language | Русский | فارسی |
| Category | news | — |
| Channel age | 2416 days | 171 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@trendwatching24
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@whsii
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.